Andrew Mitton

My experience in Alaska and My Thoughts on Wordpress, Running, Cross Country Skiing, and Anything Else that Interests Me

Yes, we’ll get that done right away

The recent ACC Docket has an arti­cle enti­tled Fenc­ing the Herd about con­fi­den­tial­ity agree­ments.  It gen­er­ally has some good advice.  But then it says the following:

As a first line of defense in pro­tect­ing your company’s con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion, you must first iden­tify what infor­ma­tion is con­fi­den­tial and/or pro­pri­etary.” OK, we’ll get this done tomor­row.  This is almost impos­si­ble to do. Think of all the hun­dreds of thou­sands of doc­u­ments a typ­i­cal large com­pany pro­duces. Plus for every doc­u­ment you review, there will be four or five new ones created.

Then the arti­cle says, “iden­tify the pop­u­la­tion of employ­ees, inde­pen­dent con­trac­tors and/or ven­dors who have access to the infor­ma­tion …” OK, we’ll get this done right away. Do you inter­view every employee? Do you review their job descrip­tions which typ­i­cally are out of synch with what employ­ees really do.  Do you look at every con­tract you have with inde­pen­dent contractors?

But there’s more, “iden­tify what steps will be required to sup­port the claim that the infor­ma­tion deserves con­fi­den­tial treat­ment.” Huh? Then the authors say, “once this is done” as if it’s so easy to do, you can gen­er­ate stan­dard agree­ments for each pop­u­la­tion and a process for obtain­ing exe­cuted agree­ments from each. Yes, this is so easy to do.

This is the type of advice that gives lawyers a bad name. This is unrea­son­able and over-lawyering. There are eas­ier ways of pro­tect­ing con­fi­den­tial information.